Coaching in the Flow: Record Yourself. You Won't Enjoy It.

One tool from the Coaches Toolbox. Start with the full toolbox.

If you've read why I stopped freezing sessions, you'll know what I think the alternative is. Coach them without stopping the game.

This is that. And it's harder than it sounds, for a reason that has nothing to do with soccer.

What it sounds like when it works

"SUPPORT, JoJo."

"Excellent BREAK, Mikey."

"SUPPORT closer, Jose."

Or, alongside a player as the ball comes towards their side: "When he checks in, go with him. Step, step, step — good."

The game never stops. Nobody stands still. Seventeen other players carry on playing while one of them gets coached, and because the situation is live, the correction happens in the moment it applies to rather than three minutes after it's gone.

That's the whole thing. Short, specific, live.

Now record yourself

Film or audio-record half of one game, or half a session. Then listen back.

I'll tell you what happened when I did it, because I doubt mine was unusual.

The first problem was hearing my own voice at all. I'd never really heard it before, and that's an odd few minutes on its own.

Then it got worse. Pauses. Uncertainty. Waffle — long stretches of jumbled speech where I was clearly assembling the sentence while it was leaving my mouth. Two or three separate thoughts stitched into one instruction that didn't quite make sense by the end of it, because it hadn't made sense at the start either.

And filler. Erms, and a lot of words doing no work whatsoever.

Not one bit of that helps a fourteen-year-old make a decision in the next second and a half.

Here's the actual problem

You don't waffle because you're a bad talker.

You waffle because you haven't decided what you're saying.

That's the whole diagnosis. When a coach starts a sentence without knowing where it ends, they compose it out loud, and composing out loud sounds like erm, and like, and you know when you, and what I mean is. The player stands there receiving a live draft.

Which means the fix isn't speech training. It's deciding before you open your mouth.

If you know that tonight is about SUPPORT, and you know what good support looks like for this group, then there's nothing to assemble. The word is already chosen. You say the word. There's no waffle available because there's no decision left to make mid-sentence.

Coaches who ramble on a field are usually coaches who haven't decided what the session is for.

Why one word can carry so much

Because you built the meaning somewhere else.

"SUPPORT" only works as a single shouted word if your players have spent weeks discovering what support is — the angle, the distance, the timing — in practices designed to teach it. Then the word is a handle on something they already own.

Say the same word to a group who've never worked on it and it's noise. They'll look at you, work out that you want something, and guess.

This is exactly why a common language exists, and why coaching in the flow depends on it completely. The keywords aren't a shortcut around teaching. They're what teaching leaves behind.

The hard part is what you don't say

You'll have the full explanation ready. You can see the whole picture — where he was, where the ball was, what the alternative was, why it matters, what it means for Saturday.

All of it is correct. None of it fits in the two seconds available.

So you have to let it go, hand over one word, and trust the practice to have done its job. That's the skill, and it's why this sits in the skills half of the toolbox rather than the tools half. You don't acquire it, you get better at it.

And if the detail genuinely matters, take it to a one-to-one, or save it for cold feedback at the next break. There's a place for the long version. It isn't while the ball's moving.

The second thing the recording tells you

There's a worse discovery waiting on that tape than the erms.

Count the names.

I said two names more than all the others put together. The best player, and the player having the hardest night.

That's not an accident and it isn't only me. Both of those players are easy to talk to. The good one is doing things worth reacting to — you're praising, you're extending, you're enjoying it. The struggling one keeps producing moments that need addressing. Both of them pull your attention because both of them generate events.

Everyone in the middle generates nothing. They do their job at a reasonable standard, they don't dazzle you and they don't give the ball away, and so they go a full ninety minutes without hearing their own name.

That's most of your squad.

Think about that from where they're standing. Two players get coached all evening. The rest get session instructions and a lift home. Not ignored on purpose — just never quite the thing you were looking at.

Coaching in the flow is what fixes it, because in-flow coaching is cheap. A three-minute freeze can only be spent on one player. A word costs you nothing, and you can spend it fifteen times in the same period. Say less to each player and you can reach all of them.

The task

Record half of one game.

Listen back and count two things.

First, how much of what you said wasn't a key word. That tells you whether you'd decided what the session was for.

Second, whose names you said, and how many times each. Write them down. That tells you who you're actually coaching.

Then run the next session having decided your word before you leave the house, and pick three players from the middle of that list — the ones who barely appeared — and make sure each of them hears their name for something specific.

You will find the first part uncomfortable. The silence feels like you're not coaching.

You are. You're just not talking.

← Back to Coaching Education — all six topics.